Rh Negative Eye Colours

It is said that eyes can never lie, that when you look into someone's eyes you can see their true spirit. There are so many different colours and shades of eyes but Rh negatives do tend to have lighter eyes in general. They also tend to have mood eyes - changing colour depending on their mood and what they are wearing.

I decided to a survey to find out the most popular eye colours in Rh negatives and then a survey out in the public where anyone could answer.

Because all eye colours are made up from brown and blue, and the colour in between those is green I decided to make the survey more fair we should group certain shades in to one of these three groups, as follows:

Brown Eyes - Amber, Black.
Green Eyes - Hazel, Olive.
Blue Eyes - Grey, Violet.

Here are the results within the Rh negative study group.

Chart Created by & © Copyright Tia L Douglass 2012 All Rights Reserved

As you can see in the Rh negative study group green is the highest, closely followed by blue and brown is the lowest. This points to the original Rh negatives having blue eyes. Brown is the dominant eye colour which normally over rides any other colour, then green, then blue. Seeing as blue is so high here it shows that those with Rh negative genes do carry the blue eyed gene strongly, as all green eyed people also carry it.

Here is the chart for the general public results, within Europe, Scandinavia, America and Australia.

Chart Created by & © Copyright Tia L Douglass 2012 All Rights Reserved

These results are harder to get a good picture from because it isn't a worldwide survey and seeing as the vast majority of the world has brown eyes. However this is including areas with the highest number of blue eyes.

What is interesting is how people seem to think that green eyes are rare, however there are lot of places in the world where the people have green eyes, and these areas show where our ancient bloodline families have visited the most, as the genes are still strong there, because as I said, all people with green eyes carry the blue eyed genes. Obviously after time an area left behind will slowly lose all green and blue eyes completely, so long as people are breeding with people with brown eyes, as they are the dominant genes.

We all have the same two eye colour genes. What gives us different eye colours are which variations of these genes we have.

One of these genes is called HERC2. It comes in two variations, brown and blue. The other gene, called gey, also comes in two versions -- green and blue.

Your eye colour depends on which combination of these versions you have as shown below:

So you can see how difficult it is for someone to have green or blue eyes, especially blue.

Chart Created by & © Copyright Tia L Douglass 2012 All Rights Reserved

Here is a map of all the places in the world where people carry the green eyed gene.

Most of the other areas are all brown eyed areas completely, with only Europe, Scandinavia, America, Russia and Australia having some blue eyes.

All Research & Graphics © Copyright Tau Tia L Douglass 2012-2015 All Rights Reserved

DO NOT COPY THIS WORK TO OTHER WEB SITES - JUST LINK TO IT

© Copyright Tau Tia Douglass All Rights Reserved - NO PART CAN BE USED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION

Find out more http://bloodtypepersonality.info/

Sumerian Gods & Goddesses

These statues date back to roughly 2500 BC. History records that they must have been "in awe" due to being in the presence of their god. (That's how they explain the wide-eyes, anyway.)

 

However, note that Incan legends record that giants with huge blue saucer-shaped eyes, white skin and red hair that supposedly built their giant stone monuments found in South America.

Also note the huge brow bridge of these wide-eyed people. That fits the Neanderthal skull. The larger brain capacity also fits Nazcan skulls. Many of them cone-headed in shape. You look at these facts carved in stone and decide for yourself. Remember that Neanderthal skeletons were found alongside Jewish skeletons in Israel, making them contemporaries! Also the Jewish Cohen Priests share the Neanderthal DNA, who were seen as the Priestly Caste, where as the others have some Neanderthal genetics, but not as many.

Also see this article about the ancient blue eyed Neanderthals http://www.templeoftheola.org/evil-eye-talisman.html

Find out more in the book Secrets of the Serpent Bloodline by Tau Tia L Douglass

Rh Disease! Since when is a different species a disease?

 Diseases vs. traits

While the science of genetics has increasingly provided means by which certain characteristics and conditions can be identified and understood, given the complexity of human genetics and culture, there is at this point no agreed objective means of determining which traits might be ultimately desirable or undesirable. Would eugenic manipulations that reduce the propensity for risk-taking and violence, for example, in a population lead to their extinction? On the other hand, there is universal agreement that many genetic diseases, such as Tay Sachs, spina bifida, Hemochromatosis, Down syndrome, Rh disease, etc. are quite harmful to the affected individuals and their families and therefore to the societies to which they belong. Eugenic measures against many of the latter diseases are already being undertaken in societies around the world, while measures against traits that affect more subtle, poorly understood traits, such as risk-taking, are relegated to the realm of speculation and science fiction. The effects of diseases are essentially wholly negative, and societies everywhere seek to reduce their impact by various means, some of which are eugenic in all but name. The other traits that are discussed have positive as well as negative effects, and are not generally targeted at present anywhere.

From http://psychology.wikia.com/wiki/Eugenics

How dare they imply that just because Rh negatives have problems when breeding with positives, that is means we should all be wiped out, as it is a disease! Since when did being a different species mean you have a disease? If Rh negatives only breed with their own kind there is no problem with the birth at all.

There is a witch hunt out against us that never went away. They won't be happy until everyone last one of us has been wiped out.

Enforced Immunization of ALL Rh Negative Women!

Many Rh negative women are coming forward with their experiences of having been given the Anti D vaccination when they were pregnant. Many are saying that their children have autism and all kinds of other health problems, that they feel were caused by having this injection in the first place. In some cases it wasn't even necessary, as both the Mother and Father were Rh negative.

So finding the following medical article claiming that all women who are Rh negative should be given this injection is very worrying indeed.

SS5-3: Rh Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn: A Major Public Health Problem.
Alvin Zipursky MD, FRCP; Vinod Paul MD, PhD

Background: Rh hemolytic disease of newborn infants is preventable by administration of anti Rh (D) gamma globulin to Rh negative women post-partum; as a result Rh disease has been virtually eradicated from developed countries.

Objectives: To provide evidence that Rh isoimmunization and consequently Rh hemolytic disease of the newborn occurs in low income countries.

Methods: The evidence has been obtained by determining the annual total distribution of anti-Rh (D) gamma globulin world-wide. That information combined with data on total births and prevalence of Rh negativity provides indirect evidence of the total number of women who have received anti-Rh (D) gamma globulin and thereby the number who have not received protection.

Results: It is estimated that annually over one million women did not receive anti-Rh gamma globulin and as a result over 100,000 babies are born with Rh hemolytic disease resulting in stillbirths, neonatal deaths or bilirubin induced brain damage (kernicterus). In many countries Rh negative women are not identified. One approach to solving this problem has been in the state of Bihar, India where there is now a program to determine Rh groups of 34 million girls, ages 0-18.

Conclusion and implications for public health practice: This serious public health problem is preventable and programs should be developed for the prevention of Rh is immunization in all women at risk and thereby the eradication of Rh hemolytic disease of newborn infants.

Ancient Bloodline

Hitler talked about A Rh positive blood being of the superior race, and wanted to wipe out anyone who carried the Rh negative genes, the Jews have a high percentage of Rh negative blood. He felt inferior to Rh negatives, as when he did studies he was amazed at the intelligence they showed above his more easy to control and less bright 'superior race'. He wanted to covet the occult teachings for himself, the teachings about true spirituality that our ancient tribes had passed down for thousands of years.

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels specifically wanted to exterminate Scottish Highlanders, Bretons, Basques, South Slavs, and Czechs. All have a higher percentage of Rh negative or carry it  recessively. Their excuse was that they are from an earlier 'primitive' population.

Extract from Friedrich Engels:
There is no country in Europe which does not have in some corner or other one or several fragments of peoples, the remnants of a former population that was suppressed and held in bondage by the nation which later became the main vehicle for historical development. These relics of nations, mercilessly trampled down by the passage of history, as Hegel expressed it, this ethnic trash always became fanatical standard bearers of counterrevolution and remain so until their complete extirpation or loss of their national character, just as their whole existence in general is itself a protest against a great historical revolution. Such in Scotland are the Gaels … Such in France are the Bretons… Such in Spain are the Basques.


Friedrich Engels, Hungary and Panslavism (1849)

 
Yes that is true, O rhesus negative blood was the first blood of humans. The ancient shamanistic tribes that inhabited the earth a long time before we created the rhesus positives when we mixed some of our genes with apes.

If anyone dares to mention the differences we are told to shut up, that we are being racist. Yet there are obvious differences and a lot of them.
 
Why do they hate us so much and say we are primitive? Even though they themselves carry some of our genes within them?
 
It is because our tribes were peaceful nature loving matriarchal clans, who lived in harmony with nature, and who didn't want their version of civilisation, e.g. Cities, pollution, industry, mass produced foods, patriarchy, war, money, greed and all the other things that have ruined our beautiful planet.
 
Will they succeed in wiping us all out, as they continue to destroy our Mother Earth? Or will we be able to stop them before it is too late?
 
You don't have to be Rh negative to care about your planet and your children, and grandchildren's future.
 
We can be the solution  http://bethesolution.net

Find out more http://serpentbloodline.info/

Psoriasis and Rh negative blood

If you have rh negative blood you are more likely to have this condition. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2244708/Britney-Spears-smiles-pain-apparent-psoriasis-breakout-ankle.html

Rhesus Negative Origins

What do you think about this video? When I first saw it I found that it made sense to me.